PaperModelers.com

Go Back   PaperModelers.com > Card Models > Model Builds > Alternate Dimensions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 12:03 AM
Paragon's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 366
Send a message via AIM to Paragon Send a message via MSN to Paragon Send a message via Yahoo to Paragon
Oh, yeah, that is the Enterprise E in the image for a size reference.
__________________
www.freewebs.com/paragon19
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 01:28 AM
Sushibones's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bursa
Posts: 61
Personally, I think she's a bit too chunky and that coupled with the excelsior inspired lower secondary hull makes her look like a new ambassador era ship rather than a sovereign contemporary. How about flattening her down along the Z axis and reshaping the lower hull to be a wee bit sleeker? Just my 2 pennies!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 03:29 AM
ThunderChild's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 247
I haven't seen an Oberth-shaped design other than the original, so I think you're doing a great job, and this will be a nice addition!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 05:13 AM
jacberk's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 56
Paragon love love your original designs. Great designs! Great work!

TC There's an Oberth-esk design out there in the Curry, Shelly class (Shelly as in Mary... Ya know Frankenstein). It's 1701-B era and parts. Never modeled but canon Star Trek and bashable from B parts.

Another kit-bash Paragon? Please, please.

Jack
__________________
Big dumb farmboy from West 'by Gawd' Virginia!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 08:16 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Schwedt/Oder, Germany
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paragon View Post
How about some design crits? Is it too unbalanced? Bulky? Does it seem impractical? Is it too big?
Okay lets see, what you have!
Saucer: looks a little bit like the ENT-E
Deck 2 inclusive the secondary shuttle bay: from the Galaxy
Bridge: also ENT-E
secondary hull: Excelsior class
Nacelles: looks like a combination of the ENT-A and ENT-E

All these is not a bad combination for a kitbash! Only the Galaxy parts are trash! These parts do not fit to the rest of the ship!

In my opinion: we have enough Federation ships! okay i really miss some canon ships But what we need are more Aliens ships!!! itīs just my opinion!

CU
Marko
Reply With Quote
Login to remove ads
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 11:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 346
I would ditch the Galaxy-style deck on top and go for a more triangular design, like on the Sovereign. I would also shrink the secondary hull, lengthen it, and include a ventral phaser array. I'd also like some more space between the outer 'ring' of the primary hull and the center section.

Overall, the chunky look is nice, but it appears a bit unbalanced.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 12:01 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 52
i agree on the galaxy shuttle bay it dosent seem to fit in with the shape of ship
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 09:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,071
Any chance of an isometric or perspective view?

Maybe a polygonal model would be better so as to show us what your planning?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 10:56 PM
Paragon's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 366
Send a message via AIM to Paragon Send a message via MSN to Paragon Send a message via Yahoo to Paragon
Wow, you all don't like that galaxy part at all. I don't want to use the Soveriegn's command deck though, and I'd like to keep a large shuttlebay there. Any suggestions for a better shape?
__________________
www.freewebs.com/paragon19
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2009, 04:33 AM
ThunderChild's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 247
Why not take a crack at designing your own from scratch, incorporating what you feel is appropriate and fitting to the design? It's non-canon anyway right?
Reply With Quote
Login to remove ads
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2