PaperModelers.com

Go Back   PaperModelers.com > Card Models > Article Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:05 PM
modelperry's Avatar
modelperry modelperry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Burlington, Iowa
Posts: 2,826
Total Downloaded: 10.41 MB
Full Hull vs Waterline

I recently read a thread entry that kinda bothered me. It basically said that waterline models were not as accurate as full hull models and kinda said that all ship models really should be full hull models.

While a full hull model may show all the parts of a ship, to say in a general way that waterline models are not accurate just doesn't seem to float. (pun intended ??).

When I see a ship in the water it is appearing as a waterline model would appear. The only time I would see a complete ship, hull and all, would be when it is in a drydock. How many times have I seen this in person? None.

So, I say build what you want and only worry about the accuracy of the parts provided (if you really care about it).

What say you?

Greg

PS. currently building a JSC waterline Bismarck and enjoying every minute of it.
__________________
In dry dock: ? In factory: CWS T-1. In hanger: Fokker triplanes? under construction: ?
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #2  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:20 PM
Tim Crowe's Avatar
Tim Crowe Tim Crowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wellingborough, U.K.
Posts: 4,719
Total Downloaded: 316.45 MB
I can see a case for both really.

Personally I think some ships look better being full hull models. For example old dreadnoughts and wooden boats.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:36 PM
OldSchoolDM OldSchoolDM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 126
Total Downloaded: 0
I'm only interested in waterline models, since I use them for gameplay, and in my games the ships are always in the water... They store more easily that way as well...

[Click a photo to see more of my Paper Fleet]






I wish more of the wonderful kits people here had waterline-option instructions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:52 PM
CNT CNT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Total Downloaded: 67.79 MB
I say, the accuracy is a function of the designer. Do full hull designers use design bureau lofting and just hit scale to 1/200 or so? I doubt it much. Of course ships are not just waterline and above, but it is modelling and to accommodate the presentation the waterline is not built. Likewise, full hull models do not have every rivet and internal bulkhead, gangway, and fixture just to close it up.

For DDGs I prefer full hull since the driveshaft and props and wave breaker form are interesting. Otherwise without 10000 guns on deck, kind of gray and drab.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2013, 02:20 PM
SJPONeill's Avatar
SJPONeill SJPONeill is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Near the Spiral, NZ.
Posts: 2,824
Total Downloaded: 436.97 MB
Send a message via Skype™ to SJPONeill
Totally agree with this: '...build what you want and only worry about the accuracy of the parts provided (if you really care about it)...'

I never really gave this specific subject much thought as I just build what's in the kit but I have to admit that, certainly with paper models, achieving a smooth hull probably absorbs more time that it is worth for me - even though a lot of the above decks detail may be fiddlier and more time-consuming it adds more to the model IMHO. Looking back, I probably would have been better off in many cases to simply go for the waterline version and display the model on a 'water' base.

Having said that, I was looking at the Modelik Dupuy de Lome last night and it would have to be built full hull to show off that amazing hull design, the full effect of which I think would be lost in a waterline model...

Simon
__________________
Please critique my posts honestly i.e. say what you think so I can learn and improve...
The World According to Me
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #6  
Old 04-15-2013, 02:32 PM
SCEtoAUX's Avatar
SCEtoAUX SCEtoAUX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 7,803
Total Downloaded: 567.16 MB
Some ships do look better as full hull, but full hull is not always needed. As far as smooth hulls go, I have seen a quite a lot of ships tied up to the pier with very wavy and rumpled looking hulls. I have also seen a few ships on the blocks in drydock with the same wavy and rumpled look to the hulls. When I build a ship model and the hull turns out not so smooth I just attribute it to the wear and tear of the ship in service.

One of the typ of ship that would look better as a full hull would be the whaleback ships of the Great Lakes. The hull design is very distinct.

whaleback ship - Google Search
__________________
~Doug~
AC010505 EAMUS CATULI! Audere est Facere THFC 19**-20** R.I.P. it up, Tear it up, Have a Ball
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2013, 03:34 PM
Scott K's Avatar
Scott K Scott K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Albion NY
Posts: 1,115
Total Downloaded: 6.62 GB
For myself, I prefer full hull models for most ships. Some ships, though, I think look better as waterline models, again, thats just my opinion. I designed my Edmund Fitzgerald as a waterline model for two reasons. I like the look of a fully loaded waterline laker, it just looks longer and sleeker. The second reason was that it was much easier to design that way. Adding the deck camber and tumblehome was hard enough, without having to design the aft underwater hull shape. (I saw that post too, and didn't agree with it, either).


Scott K.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2013, 04:17 PM
HMCS HMCS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,713
Total Downloaded: 0
great now i have the edmund fitzgerald song stuck in my head LOL
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2013, 04:22 PM
Scott K's Avatar
Scott K Scott K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Albion NY
Posts: 1,115
Total Downloaded: 6.62 GB
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMCS View Post
great now i have the edmund fitzgerald song stuck in my head LOL
You're welcome

Scott K.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2013, 05:43 PM
VinceM's Avatar
VinceM VinceM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 573
Total Downloaded: 145.94 MB
I personally prefer full hull, but a good water diorama, especially in action like a full rigged sailing ship, can look fantastic. Right now I'm building Krzychu74's SS Ivernia, and it's waterline, but he's promised a full-hull add-on. Anxiously waiting for it!!
__________________
Recent builds: RMS Queen Mary 2, Paris Opera House
In the shipyard: USS Missouri, DKM Graf Zeppelin, RV Calypso.
Future builds: IJN Akagi, SS United States, HMVS Cerberus, and lots more!
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)
Copyright © 2007-2023, PaperModelers.com