Sukhoi Su-50 - Page 2

**chiawatkom** · #11 10-14-2010, 01:11 PM

Recently, Combat Aircraft magazine front page cover, October 2010 made the report of Su-35 Super flanker, which generally having all the design as same as Su-27 but minor improvement of avionic and the engine. Highly recommend your guys to read it. I am going to work for the T-50.

**alpinemike** · #12 10-14-2010, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stormeagle

Under the Russian system of naming their planes, the T50 will have an odd number as long as it is projected to be purchased by the Russian Air Force. The even number will imply an export version with different electronics, etc. Since the last number used so far is Su-37 for fighter and Su -39 for Ground attack (updated su-25), an educated guess is that this will be the Su-41!

Actually it is NATO who refers to these aircraft as SU. The Russians list it Cyxon as in Cy-27. I would guess it is pronounced close to "sukhoi" and this is why it is spelled this way here on the west side of the globe. Ironically, the Russian company has it spelled this way right on their main hanger.

The fighter in question is technically listed as T-50 PAK-FA. And is Russia's first, generation 5.0 stealth fighter.

**chiawatkom** · #13 10-14-2010, 02:43 PM

Then this jigsaw is my latest one and aviable for free download, however, as my usual rule, you must guess what part it is, but it is not too difficult for your guys.

I have to throw away Kingston thumbdrive and buy a new one due to I almost lost this airplane with this ##@!%^&*_+ thumbdrive!!

**hawkman67** · #14 10-14-2010, 03:00 PM

Very well done!! Well done indeed:D One more cool one to add to the stable.
Jeff

**chiawatkom** · #15 10-15-2010, 07:30 AM

The model was built but it does not good enough, in my opinion. Over all is fine but urgently need improvement.

**Paragon** · #16 10-15-2010, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiawatkom

The model was built but it does not good enough, in my opinion. Over all is fine but urgently need improvement.

Which parts need improvement in particular?

**chiawatkom** · #17 10-17-2010, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paragon

Which parts need improvement in particular?

Front fuselage, exhaust, intake... as you may know, it's absolutely the fresh from the computer. :D

**Paragon** · #18 10-17-2010, 11:58 PM

Do you mind if I do some redesign of my own based on the file you've provided?

**chiawatkom** · #19 10-18-2010, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paragon

Do you mind if I do some redesign of my own based on the file you've provided?

I am pleased to see the development of this design indeed. Moreover, please add some color on them and please share to our members here so we will enjoy this scientific bird!! :D

**Paragon** · #20 10-18-2010, 12:33 AM

Awesome, exactly what I was planning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiawatkom

I am pleased to see the development of this design indeed. Moreoevr, please add some color on them and please share to our members here so we will enjoy this scientific bird!! :D