Su-27 family серийных истребителей Су-27.

**MiG-23MLD** · #1 12-15-2008, 06:42 PM

Here is my tribute to the Su-27 family in future days i will show you a couple of more of Su-27s derivatives and variants i have made but here i present you my Su-30MKI.

A person who knows well the Su-30MKI will find several unaccuracies in my model in terms of proportion, however the model more or less follows the Su-30MKI lines accurately

**John Bowden** · #2 12-15-2008, 07:13 PM

Wow....... That's pretty neat. Do you do these by scratch?

**Kaz** · #3 12-16-2008, 01:18 AM

This family of aircraft are so aesthetically pleasing to the eye, and you have done them a teriffic justice. Great work!

**MiG-23MLD** · #4 12-16-2008, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Bowden

Wow....... That's pretty neat. Do you do these by scratch?

Yes i do.

i will show you a couple of Su-27 variants i have made through the years

**MiG-23MLD** · #5 12-16-2008, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaz

This family of aircraft are so aesthetically pleasing to the eye, and you have done them a teriffic justice. Great work!

Thanks
However if you look i made a mistake in the relation of the tailplanes and the engine nozzles, the real Su-30MKI has longer jet pipes aligned to the tailplanes; also another mistake i made was the aircraft has a too sharp radome a little bit bigger than the original design and the LERXes seen from the bottom do not merge with the fuselage forebody as in my model do.

The Best Su-27s variants i have made are the Su-34 and Su-27B and a Su-30MKK

**John Bowden** · #6 12-16-2008, 03:34 PM

Have you done your namesake?

**MiG-23MLD** · #7 12-16-2008, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Bowden

Have you done your namesake?

I love the MiG-23 and MiG-25, but like the beautiful F-14 and F-15 are models i have not made they are very difficult, the main reason is the canopy, that is why i am in this forum to learn new technics.

In fact i can only make the F-16, F-18, Su-27/30/33KUB/34 and F-111 with ease.

here i leave you a Su-34 and Su-27UB, the Su-34 is an early model so it is not the best Su-34 i have made but it is still more or less okay it has some mistakes too in proportion.

The Su-27UB has some mistakes too but it is okay in general terms.

**John Bowden** · #8 12-16-2008, 05:45 PM

Boy I tell you what......... I bet all you have to do is ask, there are plenty of folks here that are willing to help you out. (present company included!)

I too like the MiG-23 and 25 and would love to see what you can do with them!

Just give a shout out, you might be surprised at the response.

john

**MiG-23MLD** · #9 12-17-2008, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Bowden

Boy I tell you what......... I bet all you have to do is ask, there are plenty of folks here that are willing to help you out. (present company included!)

I too like the MiG-23 and 25 and would love to see what you can do with them!

Just give a shout out, you might be surprised at the response.

john

My problem with the MiGs is basicly the windshield frame, the rest i can do it.

The F-15 is a bit more complex but the F-14 is the king of difficulty for my its bubble canopy is too hard for me and its framed windshield is even harder.

Any way each aircraft presents different challenges

**MiG-23MLD** · #10 12-18-2008, 06:17 PM

A Su-27B and a Lavi.

The Lavi is a single seat, so basicly is an unreal aircraft, but probably is the configuration it would have had.

The main mistakes of the Su-27B are its forebody is too sharp and a bit narrow, making the canopy a bit bigger than it really is on a real Su-27B.

The Lavi well it is only one proposed configuration how it would have looked, so its free of mistakes beyond surface ruggedness.

Currently i am making a new Su-27B and i am trying to rectify such mistakes