One model per (non-working) day

[scissorsandplanes]

After the B737 series it would have been logical to continue with either the B727 or the Airbus family, but then I noticed several other threads working on the same subjects, so I decided to do something else. It is taking me more time than I want to so please give me some time. I can tell that it will be a 1/300 scale free model

[scissorsandplanes]

Originally Posted by juan angel 747

good talking about sukhoi's I want to make fighter jets and I want to do the SU-30 and of course the SU-57 so what recommendations do you give me to start to build fighters?

Hello Juan Angel,

I think with your experience any fighter could be a good starting point. However if you are not sure about the blended forms of the more modern planes, better start with tube-like models first to get some practice.

And another advice is to look at technical drawings of the planes you build to make sure the cross sections of the fuselage are more or less correct. Many jets tend to have not so circular cross sections.. If (like with my models) there are not formers supplied, it surely is recommended.

B

[wireandpaper]

Originally Posted by scissorsandplanes

... I can tell that it will be a 1/300 scale free model

Si, si, si.

Looking forward, I know we will be very happy whatever it is.


ps: but maybe anther Antonov (70s, 148, 178) a Beriev-10, or a Dash 7 .

[Paper Fun]

Bruno, thank you for sharing your amazing work. Your generosity is exceeded by your skills, which are in turn are surpassed only by your genius. There is no need for your explanation, but rather our appreciation.
Karl

[wireandpaper]

May be it is a Space Station?

[juan angel 747]

Originally Posted by scissorsandplanes

Hello Juan Angel,

I think with your experience any fighter could be a good starting point. However if you are not sure about the blended forms of the more modern planes, better start with tube-like models first to get some practice.

And another advice is to look at technical drawings of the planes you build to make sure the cross sections of the fuselage are more or less correct. Many jets tend to have not so circular cross sections.. If (like with my models) there are not formers supplied, it surely is recommended.

B

thanks bruno for the advices so I think I'll start with the mig-15 and -17 and the F-86A could go with the 4th and 5th generation aircraft

[scissorsandplanes]

No space station, no Antonov or Beriev. Just an Atlas.

forgive me my lousy test build. Major error is the missing flap fairings. I'll need to make some corrections before releasing the model. In the mean time some pictures.
B

[wireandpaper]

Si, si, si !!!!

A tactical / strategic transport.
The RAF mobility (and most of NATO) is complete! and instead of rivaling with the C-130 and C-17, they are cooperating.

Better than an Antonov or a Beriev. No offence for them, but you already design have some of them!

[Pablito]

Bruno A400 Is it on a 1: 300 scale?

[scissorsandplanes]

Originally Posted by Pablito

Bruno A400 Is it on a 1: 300 scale?

Yes, it is. And it will be free in this thread when the errors are corrected.