#11
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for resurrecting this old thread, CaptJ, and my thanks to those who recently commented. Many of my Rigby recolors in the download section don't have a title that specify that it is a Rigby model. But, if the upload is by rockpaperscissor, and it's an airplane, it'll be a Rigby. I can't remember if I uploaded the Wildcat yet. I'll have to look. Good observation on the machine guns, CaptJ. Judging by the cowl guns, and the 4 rectangular viewing ports in the fuselage, I would say that as drawn, this is a model of the XF4F-2 prototype. Since I've changed the livery, I'll make the necessary changes to the model. If I can find a colored image of the prototype, I'll offer that one too. I have several more recolors done, but I like to beta build the model before offering them to the group. They are imprecisely drawn, and often require digital "surgery" to make them buildable. I'm sure the dimensions are way off, but these simple Rigby's were never intended to be spot on accurate anyway. If you can tell at a glance that it's a Spitfire, or a Hurricane, then they have accomplished their purpose.
__________________
Regards, Don I don't always build models, but when I do... I prefer paper. Keep your scissors sharp, my friends. Last edited by rockpaperscissor; 04-22-2020 at 06:41 AM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The Wildcat is awaiting approval from moderator. File includes 2 models: XF4F-2 prototype and "Felix" liveries.
__________________
Regards, Don I don't always build models, but when I do... I prefer paper. Keep your scissors sharp, my friends. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
file has been approved
__________________
"Rock is Dead, Long Live Paper and Scissors" International Paper Model Convention Blog http://paperdakar.blogspot.com/ "The weak point of the modern car is the squidgy organic bit behind the wheel." Jeremy Clarkson, Top Gear's Race to Oslo |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Love the photo of the prototype. But where did Rigby get the idea there was a spinner? Never heard of one on a Wildcat - was that sheer fancy?
__________________
Rob Tauxe, Atlanta, GA |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Rob, the prototype did have a small spinner. Not sure how long it lasted before they did away with it.
__________________
Ray Respect the Paper, RESPECT IT! GET OFF MY LAWN! |
Google Adsense |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
XF4Fs With Spinners
Another excellent updated Rigby, Don! After my Japanese class ends in a week or so, I look forward to finishing the P-39 and building this one.
As Ray says, the XF4F-2 prototype was tested with a small spinner and later, redesignated as XF4F-3, had a large spinner installed. One of the initial production F4F-3s (BuNo1845) was also tested with a large spinner. Image 1: XF4F-2 BuNo 0383 (Andrew Seybel photo) available from Aerofiles at Grumman Image 2: XF4F-2 BuNo 0383 available from worldwarphotos at https://www.worldwarphotos.info/gall.../f4f/xf4f-3-2/ Image 3: F4F-3 BuNo 1845 undergoing tests at Langley. Available from https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/11704609 I also referred to Mitch Mayborn et al, Grumman Guidebook: American Aircraft Series Book 4, Dallas, TX, Flying Enterprise Publications, 1976. Don |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Another Image of an F4F-3 with Spinner
I also found this color image of F4F-3 BuNo 1845. Note that the early F4F-3s also had guns in the cowling. Given the overall shape of the fuselage and vertical stabilizer, I think this was the airplane that Rigby was working from, especially since, with a temporary BuNo of 1863 and Navy markings, it was exhibited at the New York World's Fair in 1940.
Source: https://www.flying-tigers.co.uk/wp-c...-guns-1940.jpg Don |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Great photos, Don. The vertical stab of the F-3 is certainly a better match to the Rigby kit, and it has a spinner - but it only has two floor windows. The F-2 has 4 four floor windows as does the Rigby kit. The model seems to be a mash up of the two air frames. When built, the model is immediately identifiable as a Wildcat, and I think that was all that Wallis Rigby was shooting for.
__________________
Regards, Don I don't always build models, but when I do... I prefer paper. Keep your scissors sharp, my friends. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. The Rigby's were what flying model builders call semi-scale or stand-off scale. As you say, the important thing is that they were recognizable as specific airplane types. I think the 1940-41 F4F-3 with the spinner and nose guns was a very pretty airplane.
Thanks very much for making these Rigby's with your buildability and other improvements available. Much appreciated. Don |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Who would have thought that one could learn so much history, just discussing a Rigby model! Thanks to all for my enlightenment, and Don, that is a great repaint and cleanup.
John |
Google Adsense |
|
|