Grumman F-11 "Tiger" 1:33 - Page 4

**Krzychu74** · #31 06-19-2018, 05:59 PM

Hello!
Sergio: thank you very much.

Today it will be terrible and dangerous ...
The shark is coming!

Best regards.

**Vinalssergio155** · #32 06-19-2018, 06:22 PM

That shark seems very angry, better not to approach. The nose in petals is great, they give a lot of work.

**MichaelS** · #33 06-19-2018, 08:21 PM

Makes me want to do another Stahlhart Tiger. This time in Gawd's scale. ;-)

**NOBI** · #34 06-19-2018, 08:28 PM

Outstanding work, both design and build.

**Krzychu74** · #35 06-21-2018, 05:54 PM

Hello.
Thank you very much Friends.

Sergio: no worries. For friends this shark is very friendly and nice.

Next step.

Best regards.

**Vinalssergio155** · #36 06-21-2018, 06:21 PM

Now I am more relaxed knowing that the shark is very friendly. You have a great construction. I am attracted to the design that for being 1:33, to be very detailed until now, the cabin very complete and detailed, I do not see such a large number of pieces like other designs of some firms. Many pieces can be tedious, at least for me. That's what I notice in this model, more simplicity with a great result.

**MichaelS** · #37 06-22-2018, 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinalssergio155

Now I am more relaxed knowing that the shark is very friendly. You have a great construction. I am attracted to the design that for being 1:33, to be very detailed until now, the cabin very complete and detailed, I do not see such a large number of pieces like other designs of some firms. Many pieces can be tedious, at least for me. That's what I notice in this model, more simplicity with a great result.

Just exactly what he said. I like the Stahlhart Tiggers but this one is obviously more detailed. Those Tigers will quite simple aircraft so it stands to reason that a model would be too.

Just me ramblin' this morning! Excellent progress and work so far young fella..

MS

**Krzychu74** · #38 06-24-2018, 05:37 PM

Hello!
Thank you for your opinions.

That's right, the model is more detailed than Stahlhart Tiggers, but not as much as some models, for example from the Second World War (eg Haliński). Many elements has simplified, for example, main landing gear bay. There were a lot of different elements there and it would be difficult for many modellers to do it. The second thing is that I did not have a lot of documentation (especially drawings of details), and the plans I found often differed from each other. I really had to simplify many things.

The next part of the fuselage covering.

Best regards.

**Vinalssergio155** · #39 06-24-2018, 06:23 PM

As I said, your design is great, well detailed, medium quantity of pieces with a great result so far, (and so I see the end will be very good), for modelers not as advanced as me, the design is very good. work, I keep seeing everything neat, greetings

**herky** · #40 06-24-2018, 08:36 PM

looking great freind, like the petal nose.good to see your site up and running again