#4401
|
||||
|
||||
Are you planning on doing the super crusader as well?
__________________
How shall we **** off oh lord? |
#4402
|
||||
|
||||
That's gonna take a new model. The Super Cruser is bigger than the regular Cruser.
|
#4403
|
||||
|
||||
What about the Supercritical Wing Crusader?
|
#4404
|
||||
|
||||
I still gotta figure out what the differences are. So far I see new wings, weird cheek bulges, and whatever is going on above the cockpit.
|
#4405
|
||||
|
||||
An easier NASA design would be the F-8C Digital-Fly-By-Wire aircraft. As far as I can tell, smaller radome, no refueling bulge on the port side. Crusader mavens may know more, tho.
Les (The Voice of Authority -- VoiceofAuthority.net - The Voice Stylings of Les Dorr, Jr.) |
#4406
|
||||
|
||||
That would be an easier one.
|
#4407
|
||||
|
||||
|
#4408
|
|||
|
|||
Fantastic job, Murph!
I am loving those seperate tabs! Say, could you provide some for the Boeing 737-200? ---- I also really like that font you used for the "sample" watermark, whats its name? -RunwayOneSixRight (Matthew) |
#4409
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The Font is called "Checkbook". It was the closest I could find for the word "DIGITAL" on the side of the NASA F-8 |
#4410
|
||||
|
||||
Ooooohhhh Murph, your getting my credit card all itchy. I have to wait until the 15th for spare cash, but man, you are making my mouse clicking finger start to twitch.
The F-8 looks good, and I really like the separate tabs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|