PaperModelers.com

Go Back   PaperModelers.com > Card Models > Model Builds > Ships and watercraft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-29-2010, 11:55 AM
RelloemSualk RelloemSualk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ulm, FRG
Posts: 170
Total Downloaded: 0
Hallo again,

strk, moj przyjaciel, where did you make this excellent photograph?
In the harbour of Gdansk -or Shanghai ?
This one is a (illegal copy of a reengineered sovjet) chinese variant.
By the way, the Harpoon looks different and is not interface compatible to this LK90 launcher.

Today I will show the result of the next systems :
- torpedo launcher (did not find any photographs in the www)
- AK630 gatling guns, and
- FCS Bass Tilt for the AK630.
Build steps are given as usual in the attachment.
Regards
Klaus
Attached Thumbnails
Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_026.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_027.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_028.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_029.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_030.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-29-2010, 12:05 PM
strk's Avatar
strk strk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gdańsk, 3rd Republic of Poland
Posts: 742
Total Downloaded: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by RelloemSualk View Post
Hallo again,

strk, moj przyjaciel, where did you make this excellent photograph?
In the harbour of Gdansk -or Shanghai ?
Google :D, but one of 956 is an often guest in Gdynia



Quote:

Harpoon looks different and is not interface compatible to this LK90 launcher.
I know, but I mean that missile nose shape should be different - more conical.
__________________
http://www.ecardmodels.com/Modern Naval Warfare
----------------
imagination+extrapolation
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-31-2010, 08:10 AM
jimkrauzlis's Avatar
jimkrauzlis jimkrauzlis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Copiague, Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,340
Total Downloaded: 474.31 MB
Wonderful progress and work! You are doing an amazing job on this model, with so many crisp and wonderful details.

Thank you for providing so many wonderfully instructive photos!

And thank you for the great video clip, Strk! Just wondering, is it normal and permitted for the ships to blow their stacks in harbor like that? I know if you did that in New York harbor the environmental department of the state if not federal government would impose a very high fine...I was on a ship that blew her stacks at night just before departing and they still caught the violation!

Cheers!
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:32 PM
strk's Avatar
strk strk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gdańsk, 3rd Republic of Poland
Posts: 742
Total Downloaded: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimkrauzlis View Post
Just wondering, is it normal and permitted for the ships to blow their stacks in harbor like that? I know if you did that in New York harbor the environmental department of the state if not federal government would impose a very high fine...I was on a ship that blew her stacks at night just before departing and they still caught the violation!
Cheers!
Jim
Of course it is not normal and permitted. AFAIK, it was some diesel-generator/engine failure.
__________________
http://www.ecardmodels.com/Modern Naval Warfare
----------------
imagination+extrapolation
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2010, 09:46 AM
jimkrauzlis's Avatar
jimkrauzlis jimkrauzlis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Copiague, Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,340
Total Downloaded: 474.31 MB
I rather figured that was not permitted, but had to ask.:D

Cheers!
Jim
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #16  
Old 11-10-2010, 02:22 PM
RelloemSualk RelloemSualk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ulm, FRG
Posts: 170
Total Downloaded: 0
Hallo again,

@Jim, russians don't do that - as you said - its NOT permitted (big smile)
@Strk, it's not always a problem with the diesels (this class has 4 off), its sometimes (always) the poor quality of the fuel (which, of course, increases the stealth capability)

Today I will start this report with the AK130 twin barrel gun. The dedicated FCS (MR 184) will be treated later.
Skeleton parts are stiffened with Bristolpaper, some other with 1mm grey card board. The twin barrels can be moved up/down in elevation.
Progress and some build steps are given in the attached pictures.
I've also added some details - but have a look and find out.
Regards
Klaus
Attached Thumbnails
Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_031.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_032.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_033.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_034.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:14 PM
RelloemSualk RelloemSualk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ulm, FRG
Posts: 170
Total Downloaded: 0
Hallo again,

the first AK130 system is ready for installation.
I'm not so happy with the quality of my barrels, maybe
I'll do them again - no problem since they are not fixed on the
needle(s) with glue.
I've added some details I thought that can be made easily.
Progress and some build steps are given in the attached pictures.
Now the second one is waiting for final assembly (I need a subcontractor)
Regards
Klaus
Attached Thumbnails
Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_035.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_036.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_037.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_038.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-12-2010, 08:14 PM
jimkrauzlis's Avatar
jimkrauzlis jimkrauzlis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Copiague, Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,340
Total Downloaded: 474.31 MB
Awesome little gun!

I really like your work on this model...looking forward to more!

Cheers!
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-24-2011, 12:36 PM
RelloemSualk RelloemSualk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ulm, FRG
Posts: 170
Total Downloaded: 0
Hallo again,

no progress on the superstructure - but in the meantime several other tiny systems were (almost) completed :
a) SS-N-22 sunburn quadlauncher (one finshed, second 60% completed)
b) Kite Screech FCS
c) Squeeze Box WCS
d) Foot Ball (zwo completed, two pending), I'm not sure, if my assigmnent is valid, but I havn't found any (detailed) pictures of this ESM.

regards
Klaus
Attached Thumbnails
Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_039.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_040.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_041.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_042.jpg   Project 956 class destroyer 1:250 build report-us_043.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-24-2011, 01:19 PM
jimkrauzlis's Avatar
jimkrauzlis jimkrauzlis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Copiague, Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,340
Total Downloaded: 474.31 MB
Excellent work, Klaus!

Certainly worth the wait to see such wonderful work.

Looking forward to more when you are able.

Cheers!
Jim
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)
Copyright © 2007-2023, PaperModelers.com