|
Thanks, all. I need to make a correction, though. The photo's cutline says the model is of 66670. It is actually 66671. The error was mine; I gave the wrong info to the magazine.
I've long had 66670 on the brain. Been wanting to model it for a long time, and I'm trying to figure out how Ken's model could be converted. It involves some computer work that is way over my head....
|