#21
|
||||
|
||||
Looking good!
__________________
-Dan |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see on photos 1 and 2 of the post #9 above, the former for the cockpit would only be there for the front of the cockpit, but not for the union with the fuselage behind it. So I managed to put the cockpit pieces real carefully.
Photos 2 and 3 show the little gap between the top of the cockpit and the windshields. I couldn't fix it without messing the pieces, so they stayed like that. 1. 2 3 |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Dan. I'm really struggling with the width of this kind of paper, and the little surprises. But I can see I'm not the only one.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Last edited by milenio3; 02-12-2008 at 04:43 PM. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Google Adsense |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Looking good. I always liked this plane.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like another nice clean build, Gerardo!
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks friends.
Now an update for tonight. Photo 1 shows the starboard wing root. Surprisingly, the piece fit just perfect on both sides! Photo 2 is the rest of the wing. It will fit, also, very nice, except for a little tiny gap - nothing of concern though. Photo 3 and 4 are for the former of the wing. I didn't like the lack of strip for the union here, so I managed to make one from scratch. Same thing that Boosed and Dan (if I recall) are making on their planes. Photo 5 and 6 are the complete port wing. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Google Adsense |
|
|