#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Edit: Found it. I'll see what I can do to fix it. In the mean time, anyone have any other suggestions for stacks that'll work at 1:800? Last edited by Dabeer; 06-09-2011 at 06:32 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
For those looking - Falorni's stack was discussed here:
Shuttle stack problems It's quite buildable, though nowhere near AXM's level of fidelity. Yogi |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The reprinted stack is working better, but the bottom of the ET still doesn't fit. The nose, however, fits perfectly - there must have been a scaling issue with the printer the first time. I did notice, however, that the scale is different this time - my work laserjet printed it slightly larger than my home inkjet did. I hope I won't need to rebuild the orbiter...
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
So, apparently my scale estimate is wrong. I printed a 1:200 model at 4 pages per sheet, so I assumed a 1/4 scale multiplication. Measuring the model and comparing to data online, it looks like it's closer to 1:400. Oh well, I still like it :D
The good news is that the stack reprint is really close to the orbiter's scale: ~1:439 and ~1:441. Last edited by Dabeer; 06-10-2011 at 01:20 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Google Adsense |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
#17
|
||||
|
||||
That's a pretty little Columbia you've made there. The stack also came down nicely. Any plans for the MLP and crawler going with it? (AXM's 1/144 versions can be printed at 36% for 1/400 and give a good result.)
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The thought has crossed my mind - I'm really enjoying the challenge of getting as much detail as I can into such a tiny model.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
The stack turned out really well - Congratulations on a fine accomplishment
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
That's a really nice build!
__________________
Carlos |
Google Adsense |
Tags |
delta columbia |
|
|