PaperModelers.com

Go Back   PaperModelers.com > Card Models > Model Builds > Ships and watercraft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-25-2009, 02:33 PM
treadhead1952's Avatar
treadhead1952 treadhead1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,381
Total Downloaded: 0
Send a message via Yahoo to treadhead1952
Hi Jim,

As big as this beastie is going to be, I can understand some serious consideration time to figure out the best way to tackle things. Slicing and dicing as much card stock to come up with the framework as it would require makes my hands hurt and you are doing the model!

I agree with the thought of cutting it all up just to join things back together doesn't make much sense either. Looking forward to watching how you deal with it.
__________________
Jay Massey
treadhead1952
Las Vegas, NV
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-25-2009, 07:03 PM
dansls1's Avatar
dansls1 dansls1 is offline
Aviation Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL
Posts: 3,271
Total Downloaded: 0
Send a message via Yahoo to dansls1
Can't wait to see this one built! Of course I'm looking forward to the tiny planes as much as the ship. If you get too bored with the hull frames, you could always try a test build as a distraction
__________________
-Dan
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-25-2009, 08:38 PM
redhorse's Avatar
redhorse redhorse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,926
Total Downloaded: 0
I'm definitely at the ooooh aaaaah stage. This thing really is huge, I'm thinking 6 to 8 months may be optimistic. I may have to build it on the table in the other room.

I'm really looking forward to the little planes too. I've only built one card model plane, so I think a few test builds will be in order
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-26-2009, 01:47 PM
eibwarrior's Avatar
eibwarrior eibwarrior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 833
Total Downloaded: 880.4 KB
Jim, I think you could safely say about 700-800 hours for this beast. I don't know if I would include the air wing in that estimate either... The details in this kit are particularly intricate.

I don't know what pace you work at, but I'm about a 10-14 hour per week guy when I'm really rolling.... You can do the math from there.

Yes, I would highly recommend a test build on those craft. My experience has been anything below 1/72 with wings gets fidgety.
__________________
Recently Completed: 1/700 USS Nevada (resin)
In the Shipyard: 1/350 USS Washington (resin)
On the Horizon: Dom Bumagi USS Helena 1/200 (60% complete)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-26-2009, 01:52 PM
member_3 member_3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,272
Total Downloaded: 0
Strangely enough, Mr. I Hate Fiddly Bits (that would be yours truly) has assembled several 1:200 aircraft without incident or even much cussing. I will say that the sixth or seventh Val does get a little boring though.
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #26  
Old 03-28-2009, 05:48 PM
redhorse's Avatar
redhorse redhorse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,926
Total Downloaded: 0
Eib, 700 - 800 hours sounds probably about right. Rough calculations brought me to 300 hours with Isuzu and this kit seems both more complicated and from what I'm seeing, probably won't fit as well either. I'm going to photocopy a plane or two and test them out. I'm thinking they will end up being quite similar in tediousness to building tank track links after a while.

I did finally get the frames laminated. I got some 1mm illustration board from Michaels and the 2 mm parts went on 1/16th balsa. One note, 3M 77 warps balsa. I don't think it will be too bad once everything is fitted together, it should be somewhat self correcting (I'm hoping).
Attached Thumbnails
IJN Zuikaku 1:200 - GPM-03-28-09-001.jpg   IJN Zuikaku 1:200 - GPM-03-28-09-002.jpg  
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-28-2009, 06:34 PM
GreMir GreMir is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,483
Total Downloaded: 587.2 KB
Jim,
Answer used to have few planes in 1:200 scale you could download, but their page is MIA...
Kami-Mokei Ž†–ÍŒ^.comƒIƒŠƒWƒiƒ‹ has very nice set of 1:200 Zeros, Tenzans and Suiseis.
__________________
Constructive criticism of my builds is welcome - if I messed up and allowed others to see it, I certainly deserve it
Michael Krol
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-28-2009, 07:12 PM
CharlieC's Avatar
CharlieC CharlieC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,227
Total Downloaded: 16.12 MB
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreMir View Post
Jim,
Answer used to have few planes in 1:200 scale you could download, but their page is MIA...
Answer-wydawnictwo i us³ugi poligraficzne is archived on the wayback machine (www.archive.org) but with zero knowledge of Polish I can't figure out where the downloads are.

Regards,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-28-2009, 08:44 PM
redhorse's Avatar
redhorse redhorse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,926
Total Downloaded: 0
Thanks Michael & Charlie. Actually, answer.pl is back up, but the card model page has an under construction sign with only a Ki-43 I Kai shown - I found out at work yesterday paper-hobby.com is back as well but angraf seems to be down. I have some of the Angraf ones - the Bf109 and Stuka for the Graf Zeppelin. I hadn't seen the Kami-Mokei ones and they look nice, but I can't figure out how to buy them. Looks like they are for GPM's Zuikaku or Shokaku - can't tell which one.

Oh well, back to cutting out frames...
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-29-2009, 07:08 AM
Don Boose's Avatar
Don Boose Don Boose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Posts: 20,748
Total Downloaded: 424.90 MB
Those Kami-Mokei aircraft look terrific. And, although I haven't dug into this to be sure, it seems possible that Zuikaku had those aircraft on board toward the end of its career and before its death off Cape Engaño in OCtober 1944.

Have you tried buying the password and downloading them, Mike?

Don

Added later: I have started working my way through the Kami-Mokei page and now see that the aircraft are, in fact, ingended to represent the Zuikaku air group. The caption above the layout of aircraft reads (roughly -- maybe Yu-san can make corrections): "1/200 GPM Zuikaku carrier-based aircraft. Zero Fighter [Reisen] Model 52: 12 aircraft; Comet [Ryusei] Model 12, 8 aircraft; Tenzan Model 12, 8 aircraft."




Last edited by Don Boose; 03-29-2009 at 07:41 AM. Reason: Update
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)
Copyright © 2007-2023, PaperModelers.com