PaperModelers.com

Go Back   PaperModelers.com > Card Models > Model Builds > Ships and watercraft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2022, 03:31 PM
Earl Greybeard's Avatar
Earl Greybeard Earl Greybeard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 19
Total Downloaded: 0
GPM HMS Lion

Hi. I have a acquired the GPM 1:200 scale Lion, Beatty's flagship at Jutland.

Has anyone had a go at this please? In particular, I wanted to make it up as a waterline model rather than full hull. Is this where angels fear to tread

If I get beyond opening the box, I will post my efforts here.

Best wishes,

Raymond
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #2  
Old 02-24-2022, 04:32 PM
Burning Beard Burning Beard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Red Bluff, CA
Posts: 1,122
Total Downloaded: 263.00 MB
I suggest if this is not a download model, scan all the parts so they can be reprinted in case of error. A first build can be rather difficult, heck any build will throw you a clinker ever once in a while.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2022, 05:43 PM
Dazliare Dazliare is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 54
Total Downloaded: 117.37 MB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Beard View Post
I suggest if this is not a download model, scan all the parts so they can be reprinted in case of error. A first build can be rather difficult, heck any build will throw you a clinker ever once in a while.
This is great advice. Do you have a scanner you like? Or do you do this at your local office shop
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2022, 12:46 AM
roncar's Avatar
roncar roncar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 48
Total Downloaded: 2.79 MB
Hi Raymond, I built this model a few years back, scanning the GPM kit at home and reprinting it in 1/250 scale. The fit was good and there were no issues with the build that I recall. The only thing I noticed (after I had built it) is that the tripod mast supports and director tower were not added to the Lion until some time after Jutland, so the kit represents the ship as it was later, around 1917. There are some historic photographs on the internet that would guide you in simplifying the foremast in the GPM kit to the 1916 version if you felt strongly about it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2022, 01:26 AM
roncar's Avatar
roncar roncar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 48
Total Downloaded: 2.79 MB
Something i had forgotten - delete those torpedo nets, shelves and booms from the GPM model. They although fitted when launched, they had been removed from British ships a few years later and so they are not appropriate either for Jutland 1916 or especially that later trip[od mast! That will simplify the build a little.
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
  #6  
Old 02-25-2022, 04:28 AM
Earl Greybeard's Avatar
Earl Greybeard Earl Greybeard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 19
Total Downloaded: 0
Thanks Guys. That's all helpful advice.

At £36.00, it may be best for me to just buy a second copy of the original kit, rather than try to re-print. I just don't have the gear or the expertise for anything fancy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2022, 05:39 AM
PAPER FAN PAPER FAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carloina
Posts: 982
Total Downloaded: 18.58 MB
I find color matching to be the biggest issue with scan and print. Do you plan to paint the ship? No unique cammo so easy to do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2022, 11:36 AM
Earl Greybeard's Avatar
Earl Greybeard Earl Greybeard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 19
Total Downloaded: 0
I would prefer to paint. I have a airbrush, washes and the usual paraphernalia. But until now I didn't know whether I could. It looks pre-coloured in the pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2022, 09:46 PM
PAPER FAN PAPER FAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carloina
Posts: 982
Total Downloaded: 18.58 MB
I'd suggest old school brush using classic model master enamel. Real world ships were painted with massive brushes slobbed on by unskilled sailers.

Paper models bring out seams and hand painting actually adds to realism in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2022, 03:13 AM
roncar's Avatar
roncar roncar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 48
Total Downloaded: 2.79 MB
Colour matching from scans can be a problem. On the other hand, if you can tolerate the seams (after all it is a card model) a few slightly different shades of grey adds life to the model. If painted by the crew while in service, the ship is going to have some slightly different patches anyway, and the computer printer produces grey by blending tiny dots of green, blue and magenta. It produces a lively grey that cannot be matched by a flat paint job.
Matching the red panels on the underwater hull can be problematic - again, however, I've had a representative from a model ship club reassure me with advice that painting in dry dock is done in sections, with various areas of overlap, and that the anti-fouling paint weathers and fades unevenly. His members have difficulty reproducing these effects with their spray paints. He thought the card results looked pretty realistic.
(Check out my Dunkerque thread for an example of a hull in home-scanned and printed natural card colours .)
Reply With Quote
Google Adsense
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)
Copyright © 2007-2023, PaperModelers.com